Nurses Overconfidence in Self-Judgment

Table of Contents

Description of Overconfidence in Self-Judgement
Relation of the Problem to the Code of Ethics for Nurses
Main Ethical Principles to Follow When Facing the Problem
Ways of Reducing the Impact of the Problem
Summary
References

Description of Overconfidence in Self-Judgement

Reasons for Overconfidence in Self-Judgement:

Long practice period in nursing.
Premature evaluation of certain situations.
Ambition and the desire to show capabilities.
Insufficient level of vocational training.
Excessive praise from colleagues and superiors.
Inability to assess taken decisions adequately.

Negative Consequences of Overconfidence in Self-Judgement:

The wrong approach to the task.
Impossibility to evaluate the task correctly.
Problems with superiors due to incompetence.
Complaints from patients and colleagues.
Possible harm to patients health.
Violation of ethical norms and rules.

Relation of the Problem to the Code of Ethics for Nurses

Violation of the Code of Ethics for Nurses due to Overconfidence:

Irresponsible provision of quality care for patients (Zahedi et al., 2013).
Non-observance of the rules in the Code.
An initiative that contradicts the Code.
The wrong approach to the task implementation.
The final result contradicts the stated goal.
Dissatisfaction with the quality of services.

Possible Conditions for Correcting the Situation and Following the Code:

Compliance with the Code requirements.
Avoiding personal judgment and self-confidence.
Periodic consultations with colleagues and superiors.
Patients are more important than personal motives.
Analysis of the work done.
Attempts to change attitude to duties.

Main Ethical Principles to Follow When Facing the Problem

Principle of Maximum Progress when Facing Overconfidence in Self-Judgement:

Obligations to the rank of medic.
Error correction in the work process.
Attempts to self-develop and self-improve.
Desire to achieve relevant indicators.
Adequate perception of critique from outside.
Adequate assessment of strengths and capabilities.

Principle of Non-Conformism and its Possible Consequences:

Higher self-confidence may increase the quality of care (Lubbers & Rossman, 2016).
Non-conformism should be limited reasonably.
Personal opinion is not always correct.
Avoiding help worsens the relationships.
Showing leadership qualities is unreasonable sometimes.
Teamwork reinforces the morale of employees.

Ways of Reducing the Impact of the Problem

Help from Colleagues and Group Work for Improving the Situation:

Overconfidence is not a competence indicator (Molteni & Chan, 2015).
Communication helps solve the problem.
Advice from experienced colleagues is of help.
Discussion is the way to a solution.
Trainings of specialists in the team.
Evaluation of the work by colleagues.

Self-Monitoring and Analysis of the Results of the Work Conducted:

Acceptance contributes to an early solution.
Self-development and conclusions drawn from the results.
Desire to change the work style.
Prioritization and clear goals for achieving.
Self-evaluation of the work regarding the Code.
Attendance of courses on self-development.

Summary

Disadvantages of Overconfidence in Self-Judgement:

Overconfidence can lead to improper performance of duties.
Self-assessment of work is not always objective.
Non-observance of norms contradicts the Code.
Leaders dislike the work of an overconfident nurse.
Patients dissatisfaction with the quality of care.
Some self-judgments can be made incorrectly.

Possible Ways of Solving the Problem and Overcoming Failures:

Desire to self-develop compensates little experience.
Patients interests are more important than personal ambitions.
Work should be thought over carefully and beforehand.
Interaction with the team can improve results.
Following the Code helps exclude possible problems.
Adequate critique contributes to a qualitative analysis.

References

Lubbers, J., & Rossman, C. (2016). The effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 93-98.

Molteni, V. E., & Chan, E. K. (2015). Student confidence/overconfidence in the research process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 2-8.

Zahedi, F., Sanjari, M., Aala, M., Peymani, M., Aramesh, K., Parsapour, A., & Dastgerdi, M. V. (2013). The Code of Ethics for Nurses. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(1), 1-8.

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now