Category: the paradigmatic natural law view holds that there are some general rules of right that govern our pursuit of the various goods
-
some of even the most obviously morally wrong actions can be seen to promise some good a robber might kill in order to get the money he needs to pursue genuine goods and the natural law theorist wants to be able to say why these obviously morally wrong actions are morally wrong. As we have seen
each of which promises to realize some good; are there no guidelines to which we might appeal in order to show some of these choices superior to others? After all