Category: Evidence review.</td
-
there are clear developments
—
by
in </tr, </tr, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <tr, Accrued liabilities:</td, and more effective interventions are proposed with time.</td, Both hypotheses confirmed; both treatments are effective.</td, CBT and psychodynamic therapy can be employed in depression treatment.</td, Driessen et al. (2013).</td, Evidence review; personalized medicine.</td, Evidence review.</td, H1: CBT and psychodynamic therapy are not significantly different in their impact on depression.<br, H2: psychodynamic therapy is not inferior to CBT in depression treatment.</td, Hollon et al. (2014).</td, II (RCT)</td, II (RCT)</td, RCT; 341 people with depression; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; statistical analysis.</td, RCT; 452 patients with chronic or recurrent MDD (defined with the help of DSM-IV); the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Would CT combined with antidepressant use be more effective than just the use of medication in achieving remission and recovery from MDD?</tdand self-reports on experience; statistical analysis. Hypothesis confirmed; medium to considerable improvements in CBT and IPT groups; CBT shows more remarkable improvement and treatment satisfaction. Both IPT and CBT are appropriate for depression management even in their Internet form; Internet-based CBT may be more effective than Internet-based IPT. In the field of Internet-based self-help