Category: Model</strong
-
the Bivariate regression analysis revealed that the independent and dependent variables had a statistically significant relationship because Beta was.578
—
by
in .000(a)</td, .000</td, .058</td, .234</td, .256</td, .376</td, .396</td, .53505</td, .578</td, .619(a)</td, .656</td, (Constant)</td, </p, </p, </p, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, <em, <p, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td colspan=""2"", <td colspan=""2"", <ul, 1.378</td, 1</td, 1</td, 16.672</td, 16.672</td, 2 </sup, 25.511</td, 42.183</td, 5, 56.565</td, 6.897</td, 7.656</td, 94</td, 95</td, A Summary of Model.</em, Accrued liabilities:</td, Adjusted R Square</strong, ANOVA (b).</em, b</sup, B</td, B</td, Beta</td, Co-efficient (a).</em, df</strong, F</strong, Mean Square</strong, Model, Model</strong, R Square</strong, R</strong, Regression</td, Residual</td, Sig.</strong, Sig.</td, Standardised Coefficients</strong, Std. Error of the Estimate</strong, Std. Error</td, Strategic Evaluation</h4, Sum of Squares</strong, T</strong, Total</td, Unstandardised Coefficients</strong, was 0.396.</p, while R<sup, X3SE</tdwhile the outsourcing performance was the dependent variable. According to the table below
-
which means that this hypothesis was also rejected. The respondents felt that a firms competitiveness may not necessarily be defined by knowledge-oriented leadership.
Hypothesis (H4): Organizational learning culture positively and significantly influences open innovation.
The fourth hypothesis focuses on investigating if organizational learning culture significantly influences open innovation. Data obtained from the respondents were analyzed and table 6 below shows the outcome.
Table 6: Organizational Learning Culture and Open Innovation.
Model R R Square ² F Significance Organizational Learning Culture 0.202 0.041 0.202 0.933 0.344 The significance of 0.344 is greater than 0.05
—
by
in </p, </p, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </tr, <p, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, 0.008</td, 0.090</td, 0.090</td, 0.181</td, 0.674</td, ²</strong, Accrued liabilities:</td, F</strong, Hypothesis (H5): Organizational learning culture positively and significantly influences a firms competitiveness.</em, Model, Model</strong, Organizational Learning Culture</em, R Square</strong, R</strong, Significance</strong, Table 7: Organizational Learning Culture and Firm Competitiveness.</em, The significance value was determined to be 0.674, which means that this hypothesis was also rejected. Organizational learning culture does not positively and significantly influence open innovation.</pbut it is not a guarantee that open-innovation will be promoted in such a firm. Hypothesis (H3): Knowledge-oriented leadership positively and significantly influences firms competitiveness. This hypothesis focused on determining the relationship that exists between knowledge-oriented leadership and a firms competitiveness. The researcher wanted to determine if a firms competitiveness is defined by its ability…